Does productive safety net program enhance livelihoods? I

What is it about?

discussing the importance of studying the impact of the Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) on livelihoods, particularly in the context of vulnerable households in the Wolaita zone of Ethiopia. It outlines the background of previous studies that have shown the positive effects of PSNPs on food security and poverty reduction in Ethiopia and other sub-Saharan African countries. However, it also highlights the need for further investigation into the program's impact on livelihoods, given the complexity of outcomes and potential unintended consequences. The study aims to delve deeper into this area by examining various indicators such as access to basic services, income, food expenditure, adaptive capacity, and dietary diversity among PSNP beneficiaries. Ultimately, the research seeks to provide valuable insights to refine and optimize social protection programs like PSNPs.

Featured Image

Photo by EqualStock on Unsplash

Photo by EqualStock on Unsplash

Why is it important?

Understanding the impact of the Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) on livelihoods is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, numerous studies have highlighted the positive effects of PSNPs on food security and agricultural productivity, particularly in Ethiopia. These analyses have underscored the program's role in enhancing food security and reducing poverty, especially among female-headed farm households. Moreover, within the broader sub-Saharan African context, PSNPs have consistently demonstrated effectiveness in improving food security and reducing poverty among participating households. However, the study of livelihood impacts presents a more nuanced picture. While some studies have reported positive effects such as reduced poverty and improved food security, others have emphasized the necessity for more transformative measures to stimulate long-term economic growth and social change. Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding the sustainability of PSNPs in certain regions and potential unintended consequences, such as decreased labor market participation or limited impacts on income and asset accumulation among the poorest households. Given this diversity of findings, there is a clear need for further investigation into the multifaceted effects of PSNPs, considering dimensions such as assets, income, adaptive capacity, and food security. It is particularly important to focus on specific contexts, such as rural areas in Ethiopia, where poverty and food insecurity are most acute. Targeted research in these areas can provide valuable insights to refine the design and implementation of effective social protection programs. This study aims to contribute to this area of research by examining the PSNP's impact on beneficiaries' livelihoods. It will consider indicators such as access to basic services, income, food expenditure, adaptive capacity, and dietary diversity. By delving deeper into these aspects, the research seeks to fill existing gaps in understanding and inform the refinement and optimization of social protection programs like PSNPs.

Perspectives