What is it about?

Hannah Arendt and Jacques Rancière both, in different ways, say politics involves an active relation to a dominant order; for example, speaking in the public sphere (Arendt), or challenging who counts as an appropriate participant in the public sphere (Rancière). However, this means they're in danger of downplaying the politics of people who evade the public sphere, such as the fugitivity of the enslaved during U.S. plantation slavery. This can be seen when compared to Saidiya Hartman's work, and much recent black studies scholarship more generally.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

If politics is only understood as in some way maintaining an active relation to a dominant order, then people who are excluded from this order are depoliticised. Recognising their activity as being political, even if they evade an active relation to a dominant order, may help expand and contort dominant understandings of politics.

Perspectives

This is a significantly expanded and developed version of the final chapter of my thesis, and lays the groundwork for my current and, hopefully, future research.

Dr Timothy J. Huzar
National Coalition of Independent Scholars

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Toward a Fugitive Politics: Arendt, Rancière, Hartman, Cultural Critique, January 2021, Project Muse,
DOI: 10.1353/cul.2021.0001.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page