What is it about?
The broad object of this study is the academic field of the book and the book as an area of interdisciplinary teaching. Purpose: to prove that the 21st-century cross-media and hybrid media ecosystem emancipates Book Science from the rest of the sciences in whose objects it can partake only as a constituent using one of its elements, properties or attributes. Tasks: to identify and summarise the theoretical and methodological differences between conventional Book Studies and the specific Book Science; to update and conceptualise the understanding of the book as a traditional means of communication in the light of the modern perspectives of digital transformation; to offer a framework of an innovative media science of the book.
Featured Image
Photo by matthew Feeney on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Returning to the matter of the book as a medium, the hypothesis to be tested in this study is: “the book is set to be vindicated as a basic scientific category and be studied by a science of its own as an agent of communication, while the scientific book – as a communicator of “good” science. Methods: analytic and synthetic processing of primary and secondary resources, the selective monographic method, systematisation and summarisation of data from scientific-methodical and normative-legal documents on the issue examined. Based on a working hypothesis, this study provides theoretical knowledge in Book Science and proposes points of support toward future fundamental and applied research in Book Science.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Cross-Disciplinary Higher Education between Medialogy and Bibliology: Book Science as Degree Programme in Universities Worldwide, European Journal of Contemporary Education, December 2019, Academic Publishing House Researcher,
DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2019.4.889.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page