What is it about?

This method shows time points where group signals are higher or lower than a baseline, or differ between groups. The approach is applicable to physiologic challenges where a baseline is followed by one or more trials. For example, an autonomic test might involve a 1 minute baseline, an 18 second Valsalva maneuver repeated four times at 1 minute intervals, and a 30 second recovery. Physiologic signals could include fMRI in one location or heart rate. For many physiologic protocols, the timing of exactly when a response occurs is important. The analysis shows time points when mean group signals are differ from baseline or other groups, controlling for repeated measures and the random effect of "subject"; in other words, the results account for for the lack of independence between repeated measures and individual subject variation.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The method is useful for analyzing complex responses that don't follow a simple "on/off" pattern. For fMRI, we use this as a complement to standard boxcar analyses (as with SPM software).

Perspectives

We found in our research of fMRI and heart rate responses to autonomic challenges that we needed a method to identify exactly when the heart rate or fMRI signal changed 1) from baseline, and 2) between-groups.

Dr Paul M Macey
University of California Los Angeles

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Detecting variable responses within fMRI time-series of volumes-of-interest using repeated measures ANOVA, F1000Research, April 2016, Faculty of 1000, Ltd.,
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8252.1.
You can read the full text:

Read
Open access logo

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page