What is it about?

Invited commentary on Christian Robert et al's extensive analysis of Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Stresses the influence of Cambridge philosopher Broad's criticism of Laplacian Bayesian analysis on Jeffreys's thinking.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Comment, Statistical Science, May 2009, Institute of Mathematical Statistics,
DOI: 10.1214/09-sts284b.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page