What is it about?
This study shows how new computer methods can help geoscientists fill in missing data from well logs, which are important for understanding underground rocks and making decisions in oil and gas exploration. Instead of just guessing a single “best” value, the approach predicts a likely range for each missing value, showing how confident we are in each prediction. This makes the results more trustworthy and helps teams manage risks when planning drilling and development. The method works by using information from other logs and carefully checking the reliability of each prediction. This helps geoscientists make better-informed choices and meet new requirements for safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence in the industry.
Featured Image
Photo by Dan Meyers on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This publication is important because it introduces a powerful new approach that not only predicts missing well log data—a common and critical challenge in oil and gas exploration—but also provides a reliable measure of how certain those predictions are. By using advanced machine learning methods that work with any dataset and do not require complicated statistical models, the study allows geoscientists to make better, safer decisions. What makes this work unique and timely is: 1). It goes beyond traditional methods that only give a single best-guess and instead delivers a range of possible values, clearly communicating the level of confidence in each prediction. 2). This uncertainty information is essential for risk management and is increasingly required by new regulations, like the EU AI Act, for responsible use of artificial intelligence in high-risk industries. 3). The approach is flexible, easy to apply with modern tools, and provides geoscientists with both accurate results and actionable risk estimates—helping guide crucial choices during exploration, development, and reservoir management.
Perspectives
As a geoscientist, I see this publication as a major step forward in making machine learning truly useful for real-world subsurface workflows. In my experience, uncertainty and missing data are constant challenges when working with well logs—yet most predictive tools still produce only point estimates, leaving critical questions about reliability unanswered. This study’s approach gives practical risk boundaries for predictions, which is exactly what decision-makers need when managing exploration investments or interpreting reservoir performance. The method’s transparency, ease of implementation, and regulatory readiness also mean it is suited for daily operational use, not just research prototypes. For teams focused on data-driven exploration and compliance with emerging AI standards, the ability to demonstrate both predictive accuracy and risk awareness is increasingly important.
Kushwant Singh
VGS & Associates
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF WELL LOG PREDICTIONS, Interpretation, October 2025, Society of Exploration Geophysicists,
DOI: 10.1190/int-2025-0008.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
