What is it about?
Eco-standards for shrimp aquaculture are an increasingly important sustainability tool. The inclusion of farmers is thought to improve the technical relevance and implementation of these standards. We find that farmers, like many other public and private groups, express their own interests and agendas through these standards. 'Participatory eco-standards' are therefore not necessarily more objective and equitable. Social science input is therefore needed at all steps of the design process.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
For eco-standards to be more effective in improving the performance of aquaculture, or any other sector, they need to demonstrate improvement while being more inclusive of small-holders and maintaining their credibility. Participatory design processes might be one way to achieve these goals. But such processes should not be assumed to be 'better' per se. Understanding how the interests and agendas of farmers and others are expressed in the design process can help improve standard setting processes.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Co-producing Better Management Practice standards for shrimp aquaculture in Indonesia, Maritime Studies, December 2015, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1186/s40152-015-0039-4.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page