What is it about?
I am very happy to share our scoping review publication on the utilization of the positive deviance approach for healthcare service delivery. I thank you very much all the contributors of the article and hope this article could be of an interest for many to learn the approaches utility for healthcare service enhancement programs. Written be low are introductory sections of the article. Healthcare systems worldwide are faced with a myriad of challenges in enhancing accessibility and delivering top-notch healthcare services on a global scale. These hurdles encompass deficiencies in data collection and monitoring systems, subpar organizational team culture and limited capacity, ineffective leadership, a lack of incentivization for outstanding performance, and a scarcity of evidence-based health policies to bolster implementation and enhance the proficiency of healthcare professionals. Consequently, there is an increasing imperative to explore and adopt innovative approaches to enhance and provide safe, effective, and high-quality healthcare services within the healthcare system. The positive deviance approach emerges as an innovative strategy aimed at identifying exemplary practices existing within a given community. This community, within the healthcare context, encompasses various entities including teams, groups, departments, and organizations. For example, regional/provincial, zonal, and district-based administrative health offices, local health facilities, and their respective units can be considered as departments and organizations within this community. Notably, social service agencies, healthcare organization representatives, and local government bodies have been regarded as integral components of communities in studies employing the positive deviance approach to understand collaboration among social service and healthcare providers in communities achieving relatively low levels of healthcare utilization and expenses among senior citizens. This approach acknowledges the intrinsic value of existing expertise and operates under the premise that solutions to problems already exist within the community. By identifying and disseminating these solutions, others can effectively address existing complex and intractable challenges. It further underscores that despite facing similar resource constraints, there are individuals who excel in their performance within organizations, and when given the opportunity, these positive deviants are eager to share their experiences, particularly when leaders facilitate the process.
Featured Image
Photo by Francisco Venâncio on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This scoping review synthesized the evidence regarding the use of the positive deviance approach in healthcare system service delivery and quality improvement programs. The findings have indicated that healthcare systems have been able to enhance quality, reduce errors, and improve patient outcomes by identifying lessons from those who exhibit exceptional practices and implementing successful strategies in their practice. All the outcomes of PD-based research, however, are dependent on the first step of identifying true positive deviants. Hence, the scoping review has highlighted the criticality of using objective and validated measures of performance to identify positive deviants as failure to identify true PDs can subsequently lead to failure in identifying best practices for learning and dissemination to other contextually similar settings.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: a scoping review, BMC Health Services Research, April 2024, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10850-2.
You can read the full text:
Resources
The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: A scoping review
It is an open access article.
Use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: a scoping review protocol
This is the scoping review protocol published in the BMJ Open Journal.
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page