Publication not explained

This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.

If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: The Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT), BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2009, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-37.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page