A Geo-strategic Understanding of the Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar

What is it about?

Since the enactment of the 1982 Burmese Citizenship Law, the Rohingya Muslims have been stateless, and they are attempting to become Burmese citizens. In Myanmar, ethnic identity continues to be the most politically significant marker stratified by government policy. Despite Myanmar’s official recognition of 135 minority groups, ethnic identities are fixed in exclusionary terms like Buddhist or non-Buddhist, Bamar or non-Bamar. Ethnicity and religion, therefore, have played a significant role in the formation of Myanmar’s national identity, that systematically excludes the Rohingyas. Hence, religion and ethnic identities are often contemplated as the major reason for the Rohingya crisis. However, contrary to the popular perception, this article argues that, along with the ethnic and religious aspects of the Rohingya conflict, the geo-strategic and economic aspects of the conflict must also be addressed with seriousness, as the conflict has occurred under a variety of political and economic conditions. It investigates the role of resource geo-economics of the Myanmar government and military forces in the recent conflict. Furthermore, this article examines China’s and India’s vested geo-strategic and economic interests in Rakhine. Findings from the research imply that the persecution and displacement of the Rohingyas may be linked to the resources and geo-strategic factors present in Rakhine.

Featured Image

Photo by SH Saw Myint on Unsplash

Photo by SH Saw Myint on Unsplash

Why is it important?

It investigates the role of resource geo-economics of the Myanmar government and military forces in the recent Rohingya conflict. Furthermore, this article examines China’s and India’s vested geo-strategic and economic interests in Rakhine. The persecution and displacement of the Rohingyas may be linked to the resources and geo-strategic factors present in Rakhine.

Perspectives