What is it about?

Until recently, Mediterranean countries were called on by European Union officials to enhance “flexicurity”. This paper critically examines post-2008 flexibilization trends by focusing on Spanish, Italian and Greek regions. Starting from a contextualization of atypical employment and security, it then moves in a twofold direction; firstly, it presents the Flexible Contractual Arrangements and Active Labour Market Policies composite indicators, calculated for the NUTS-II regions of 12 member states for 2008 and 2011; secondly, it focuses on the changing forms of atypical labour in the six regions that host the capital and the most important port city of Greece, Italy and Spain, respectively, by offering data on the expansion of flexible arrangements therein. The uneven flexibilization trends found in the study regions are seen as an outcome of the interaction between the general devaluation trends, different backgrounds and regionally specific patterns of labour market adjustment, while employment is found to be neither “rigid” nor “flexicure”.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Employment in Mediterranean EU countries is found to be neither “rigid” nor “flexicure”

Perspectives

Employment in Mediterranean EU countries is found to be neither “rigid” nor “flexicure”

Dr Stelios Gialis

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Antinomies of flexibilization and atypical employment in Mediterranean Europe: Greek, Italian and Spanish regions during the crisis, European Urban and Regional Studies, July 2016, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0969776414538983.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page