What is it about?
This paper traces the open access policy journey of 107 journal publishers over 12 years from 2004-2015. It reveals how policies have become increasingly complex and restrictive despite an increase in the number of publishers allowing authors to place some version (pre-print, post-print or both) of their journal paper on the internet.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The paper suggest that the colour codes 'green', 'blue', and 'yellow' applied by the RoMEO Database of publisher open access policies to describe whether a publisher allows the pre-print, post-print or both to be made available on the web, no longer adequately define a publisher's commitment to open access. The paper calls for Open Access advocates to redefine what it means to be 'green' to ensure it rewards those who fully support community-agreed definitions of Open Access.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: What does ‘green’ open access mean? Tracking twelve years of changes to journal publisher self-archiving policies, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, July 2016, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0961000616657406.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page