This shareable PDF can be hosted on any platform or network and is fully compliant with publisher copyright.
This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.
If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.
This page is a summary of: A formal Anthropocene is compatible with but distinct from its diachronous anthropogenic counterparts: a response to W.F. Ruddiman’s ‘three flaws in defining a formal Anthropocene’, Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment, April 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0309133319832607.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page
