What is it about?
During surgery under general anesthesia, a better tool (index) than hemodynamics including blood pressure or heart rate has been needed and developed. Of the new tools, the parameters derived from finger photoplethysmography appear to be suitable for monitoring autonomic nervous system activation. Among them, clinical application of the SPI has been more frequently reported than other devices. However, previous studies comparing surgical pleth index (SPI)-guided and conventional analgesia using hemodynamics have shown somewhat differing results. This article is a meta-analysis review article about the SPI.
Featured Image
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash
Why is it important?
SPI-guided analgesia appears to effectively provide adequate analgesia during general anesthesia based on several studies that have shown a good response to the SPI following the administration of various opioids. However, the clinical application of SPI may have considerable limitations associated with the patient population, positioning, fluid balance, type of anesthesia, or concomitant use of cardiovascular drugs. Moreover, considering the differences in the reported intraoperative opioid requirement and the degree of postoperative pain between SPI-guided and conventional (standard clinical practice) analgesia as indicated by hemodynamic parameters, there is a need to investigate whether SPI-guided analgesia is more beneficial than conventional analgesia.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Usefulness of surgical pleth index-guided analgesia during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Journal of International Medical Research, September 2018, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0300060518796749.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page