What is it about?
Recent discussions of the epistemological and political implications of the situatedness of knowledge in International Relations (IR) have raised important questions regarding the future development of the discipline. They pose the challenge of understanding under what conditions human beings develop more or less reality-congruent knowledge about world politics, and what are the implications of such knowledge to emancipatory political activity. This article argues that process sociology should be understood as a relevant complement to these discussions. Assuming a fundamentally ‘realist’ orientation, process sociology provides a sociologically-informed analysis of the material, ideational and emotional forces shaping the development of knowledge. As such, it can help those concerned with the implications of the situatedness of knowledge in IR reinforce their capacity to both understand the social conditions under which it is possible to develop more detached and reality-congruent knowledge about the world and better identify and explain the historically-emergent values that should orientate the emancipatory transformation of world politics.
Featured Image
Photo by Patrik Göthe on Unsplash
Why is it important?
A process sociological approach to the challenges posed by the situatedness of knowledge in International Relations.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Reality-congruence, emancipatory politics and situated knowledge in International Relations: A process sociological perspective, International Relations, October 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0047117819879473.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page