What is it about?
covert sound recording by patients/litigants is morally and ethically wrong; the contract between doctor(expert) and patient(litigant) is equivalent on both sides. Covert recording should cast doubt on the litigant's position. If both sides agree the situation is different but the mere recording of a consultation alters its dynamic and throws doubt on it veracity
Featured Image
Why is it important?
honesty is essential
Perspectives
see the paper
Michael Swash
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The covert recording of medico-legal consultations, Medico-Legal Journal, August 2018, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/0025817218783177.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
