What is it about?
Several common statistical hypothesis tests are applied to simulated series with varying degrees (and types) of temporal dependence and contemporaneous correlation. It is shown that the Hering and Genton (HG) test is the most accurate in terms of type-I errors, and is also a powerful test. The circular block bootstrap approach, while not as accurate as the HG test, is generally reasonably accurate when the series are temporally dependent, and the iid bootstrap when they are independent; like the HG test, both are robust to contemporaneous correlation. Other tests, such as the usual t-test and normal approximation, even when a variance-inflation factor is applied, are not robust to the contemporaneous correlation.
Featured Image
Photo by Nancy Cantwell on Unsplash
Why is it important?
In weather forecast verification, the it is fairly uncommon to account for dependence, especially contemporaneous correlation, when testing whether one forecast model is better than another on average. Sometimes the variance-inflation factor (VIF) is used, but in this case, usually only the AR(1) version is used, and it can be very inaccurate if the series does not follow an AR(1) process.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Testing the Tests: What Are the Impacts of Incorrect Assumptions When Applying Confidence Intervals or Hypothesis Tests to Compare Competing Forecasts?, Monthly Weather Review, June 2018, American Meteorological Society,
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-17-0295.1.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page