What is it about?

This paper examines the relationship between Risk Management Committee (RMC) characteristics and the extent of hedging activities disclosure within the annual reports of the Malaysian listed companies. In particular, relationships are tested on RMC size, independence, RMC meeting, RMC gender diversity and RMC training. Our regression analysis shows that RMC independence significantly and negatively influences the extent of hedging activities information disclosure, while RMC meeting positively influences the disclosure. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

While MFRS 7 has just been applied by business entities in Malaysia, several studies in other countries have raised concerns regarding the extent and quality of the derivatives disclosure provided by companies in meeting this accounting standard, particularly on the hedging activities information. It was claimed that the derivatives disclosure was less useful and subject to management discretion. Moreover, since hedge accounting is optional, companies may use their discretion not to report the use of derivatives for hedging activities. Several studies provide evidence that companies avoid full compliance in disclosing their hedging activities information in annual reports. In this respect, some studies propose that one of the important elements that should exist in a company for a better transparency of derivatives and hedging activities disclosure is the establishment of Risk Management Committees (RMCs). Nevertheless, there are mixed empirical evidences justifying the existence of RMCs and the degree of transparency and quality of financial instruments disclosure, particularly on the derivatives and hedging activities information. Thus, it is the objective of this study to examine the effectiveness of RMCs. Different from earlier studies, this study focuses on the characteristics of RMCs as a proxy for its effectiveness (i.e. size, independence, meeting, diversity and training).

Perspectives

Author’s point of views-Possible reasons • Independent directors do not contribute their experience as well as their skills and knowledge towards increasing the information on hedging activities as RMC members. • Independent directors do not play an active role in supervising and monitoring the RMCs. Perhaps, they have a busy schedule and commitment towards other activities. • Independent directors may have a relationship with the management. As a result, their decision making in RMCs may have been influenced by the management due to their relationship with the company.

Dr. Azrul Abdullah, Ph.D, C.A.(M), NCE
Universiti Teknologi MARA

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Risk Management Committee and Disclosure of Hedging Activities Information Among Malaysian Listed Companies, Advanced Science Letters, June 2015, American Scientific Publishers,
DOI: 10.1166/asl.2015.6140.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page