Skin Nourishing Effects of Biofield Energy Healing Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation

What is it about?

The aim of the present study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of a Consciousness Energy Healing (The Trivedi Effect®) Treatment based test formulation on skin health.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The cell viability by MTT assay exhibited more than 70% cells were viable in all the tested concentrations. The percent cell proliferation using BrdU assay at 8.75 μg/mL was significantly increased by 343.57%, 100.29%, and 132.6% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation, BT-DMEM + UTTest formulation, and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively compared to the UT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation group. The level of collagen was increased by 5.94% and 10.84% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.625 μg/mL with respect to the UT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation group. The level of elastin was significantly (p≤0.001) increased by 15.95%, 58.31%, and 47.18% at 2.5 μg/mL in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation, BTDMEM + UT-Test formulation, and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively compared to the UTDMEM + UT-Test formulation group. Moreover, elastin level at 10 μg/mL was significantly (p≤0.001) increased by 119.73%, 76.98%, and 181.73% in the UT-DMEM + BTTest formulation, BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation, and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively compared to the UT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation group. Hyaluronic acid was increased by 15.13% and 68.56% at 0.625 μg/mL in the BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively compared to the UT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation group. However, it was also increased by 5.18% and 56.39% in the BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BTTest formulation groups, respectively at 1.25 μg/mL compared to the UT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation group. Melanin level was reduced by 17.06%, 6.94%, and 13.07% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation, BT-DMEM + UTTest formulation, and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.063 μg/mL with respect to the UTDMEM +UT-Test formulation group. Protection with respect to UV-B, showed that the percent cell viability was altered minimally in the different test concentrations. Wound healing results showed significant effects on wound closure and cell migration in the test formulation and DMEM groups in HFF- 1 cells compared to the untreated group. Overall, the Biofield Energy Treated test formulation (The Trivedi Effect®) and DMEM have shown significant protective effects on various skin health parameters such as skin whitening, aging, wrinkling, and wound healing. Therefore, the Biofield Energy Healing based test formulation could be suitable for the development of herbal cosmetics, and it would be useful for the management of wounds and various skin related disorders viz. cellulitis, abscess, syringoma, pimple, impetigo, scabies, photosensitivity, urticaria, hives, warts, acne, abscess, callus, skin aging, wrinkles and/or change in skin color, chickenpox, eczema, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, athlete’s foot, psoriasis, contact dermatitis, cutis rhomboidalis nuchae, erythema, etc.