What is it about?
This study sought to determine the impact of alternative strategies for assessing eligibility for domiciliary oxygen on funded oxygen use, cost, and quality of life.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Our findings showed that following a reassessment of applicants after several months of initial domiciliary oxygen therapy, a large portion of initially eligible patients were no longer eligible. Thus, the reduced program costs to the public funders without adverse effects on quality of life, mortality, or other resource use.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A Randomized Trial of Strategies for Assessing Eligibility for Long-Term Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, September 2005, American Thoracic Society,
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200412-1692oc.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page