What is it about?
Philosophy is sometimes defined as a distinctly European and Western project, but in this project the idea that philosophy is found in all world cultures is promoted. In this particular essay, the author tries to identify a basis that makes it possible to compare the German philosophers Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger, with the Japanese philosopher Nishida Kitarō. This is done by arguing that the three philosophers assess the basic concepts of meaning, reason and freedom in relation to three basic phenomena, identified by Cassirer as that of "I", "activity" and "work".
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The overall project is important in that it tries to meet the demands of our times, the age of fluid modernity, on several levels: the level of philosophical dialogue between cultures; the level of research into the interconnection between philosophy, religion, politics, and everyday culture; and the pedagogical and didactive level of teaching philosophy on both a basic and and advanced level. This essay addresses in particular the problem of how to compare cultural specificities through textual analysis of a philosophical kind, connected to "grand modern categories", such as "meaning, "reason", and "freedom".
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: From the Problem of Meaning via Basic Phenomena to the Question of Philosophy after Metaphysics: Cassirer, Heidegger, and Nishida, December 2023, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004680173_012.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page