What is it about?
This paper approaches symbolic insult in diplomacy as the use of symbolic means by states to oppress the opponent’s sense of Self, to hurt its self-esteem and social status in order to achieve their foreign policy objectives, or as a reaction to a threat from the Other. I distinguish three forms of symbolic insult used in diplomacy: by misrecognition (“diplomatic bypassing”), direct confrontation (“diplomatic punch”) and concealed verbal or nonverbal actions (“diplomatic slap”). The paper focuses on the third, indirect form, or “diplomatic slap” which employs obscure symbolic insults as a means of tacit manipulation for influencing the opponent, or as an instrument of restoring social status.
Featured Image
Photo by Brooke Lark on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Despite the fact that symbolic insults are part of diplomatic manipulative practices, this phenomenon was not studied. But such a study is important because it can help make diplomacy more effective and less manipulative.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Symbolic Insult in Diplomacy, Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, January 2017, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/24056006-12340008.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page