What is it about?

In his 'Ambigua to John,' Maximus the Confessor discusses a passage of Gregory Nazianzen describing divine Logos that “plays in all kinds of forms.” The context of St Maximus’ commentary allows restoring the basic meaning of ‘playing’ and ‘playthings,’ which hardly match the typical image of God. Playing games is considered an unserious, primarily childish occupation, that has neither substantial cause nor aim. If adults take part in games, they do it for pedagogical goals only. The article emphasises four main approaches of the Ambiguum 71 to ‘acquit’ the image of ‘playful’ God. All four parts of the Ambiguum are linked together in a common structure. This structure is expected to be directly derived from the triad “practical philosophy — natural contemplation — mystical theology,” which was very often used by Maximus the Confessor.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Playing games is a common feature of human beings in every culture and period of history. This study provides an insight into the understanding of playing and games as it was described by St Maximus the Confessor, a Byzantine theologian of the 7th century AD.

Perspectives

This research is a part of our scientific project studying the perspectives of Biblical humour transferred into the area of serious by early Byzantine Bible exegetes.

Dmitry Kurdybaylo
Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Some Notes on “playing Logos” in Ambiguum 71 of St Maximus the Confessor, Scrinium, July 2021, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/18177565-bja10046.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page