What is it about?

Due to recent religious developments, according to which the demand of same-sex couples for the recognition of their life partnerships in different religious communities in the meantime is completely or partly satisfied through marriages or blessings, the attention is drawn to certain readings in the first book of Samuel and in the book of Ruth that are interpreted in a queer way.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Queer interpretations contribute to the goal of enabling more queer lifestyles today in order to support lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders, intersexuals and others who question their sexual orientation or their identification with the sociocultural gender assigned to them. The application of queer studies to biblical studies, Jewish studies, and art history is an innovative undertaking that is unfortunately necessary due to the long and, to a certain extent, still existing homophobic and transphobic traditions associated with biblical texts.

Perspectives

In the biblical contexts of the books of Samuel and in the book of Ruth, both with the homoerotic stories about the triangle between Saul, David and Jonathan (plus their women) in the books of Samuel and with the polyamorous story about Ruth, Naomi and Boaz in the book of Ruth, exclusive partner relationships do not exist, but multiple relationships occur. This indicates a different understanding of marriages and weddings than we have today. In the first encounter between David and Jonathan in 1 Sam 18:1–4, which is often used as a reading during the wedding service for a male couple, Jonathan pledges a life partnership to David (a name that means nothing else but “the beloved”). Simultaneously with Jonathanʼs repeated expressions of affection for David, King Saul takes this beautiful young man, victorious in battle, home and does not allow him to return to his fatherʼs house. This is why David might be compared to a newly married bride who moves into the household of her spouse. The telling names sustain a queer interpretation of Ruthʼs vow to be faithful to Naomi in Ruth 1:14–17, the reading for a female couple. From both a biblical and a present-day perspective, it cannot be ruled out that the relationship between Ruth, “the girlfriend”, and Naomi, “the sweetheart” or “lustful one”, is understood as erotically motivated. Clinging to her mother-in-law, Ruth swears lifelong fidelity to Naomi. Parallel formulations in the book of Ruth and the second creation account suggest, from a queer perspective, a quasi-marital relationship between Ruth and Naomi. The creation of sexually ambivalent figures in works of art from the second half of the 19th century in England offers additional queer interpretations of these biblical passages, remarkably homoerotic as they are: Simeon Solomon draws David as an effeminate lover of Jonathan at the oath of love (1 Sam 20:17), and Philip Hermogenes Calderon paints Naomi as a sexually ambivalent character in a heartfelt embrace with Ruth (Ruth 1:14–17).

Dr. phil. Mag. theol. Karin Hügel
research fellow University of Vienna

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Lesungen für Segnungsfeiern und Trauungen gleichgeschlechtlicher Paare, queer ausgelegt. Jonatans Zusage der Lebensgemeinschaft an David (1 Sam 18,1–4) und Ruts Treueschwur gegenüber Noomi (Rut 1,14–17), December 2025, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004746039_010.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page