What is it about?

My queer interpretations of the books of Ecclesiastes and of Song of Songs – both are writings that belong to the biblical Wisdom literature and which were endowed with the authority of King Solomon probably not before the middle of the 2nd century CE – focus on the polyphony of the statements on human sexuality in the Hebrew Bible. Certain verses from the books of Ecclesiastes and of Ruth as well as Song of Songs are understood from a queer point of view as counter-texts to the conservative exegeses of Gen 2:18–24 in the second creation account concerning marriage. In the books of Ecclesiastes and Ruth other models than an exclusive relationship between a man and a woman are suggested.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Queer interpretations contribute to the goal of enabling more queer lifestyles today in order to support lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders, intersexuals and others who question their sexual orientation or their identification with the sociocultural gender assigned to them. The application of queer studies to biblical studies, Jewish studies, and art history is an innovative undertaking that is unfortunately necessary due to the long and, to a certain extent, still existing homophobic and transphobic traditions associated with biblical texts.

Perspectives

To answer the question which partners we need in order not to be alone or to be able to survive, a text of the Hebrew Bible like Eccl 4:9–12 suggests also other models than an exclusive man-woman relationship. It can be argued from a queer perspective that a sexual relation between men is mentioned in Eccl 4:11: That two men warm each other while lying, can imply that they sexually arouse each other. Within the framework of a queer reading, this may also trigger associations about other, diverse, queer companions, who sexually arouse each other while lying. Various things can be associated with the threefold thread that is not so easily torn apart mentioned in Eccl 4:12. Not only future children, as asserted in Ecclesiastes Rabbah, may form a basis for partnership – perhaps also queer – but affection and sexual desire also play an important role. It follows from later rabbinic interpretations in Mishnah Qiddushin (“Betrothal”, “Engagement”) 4:14 and parallel passages in the tractate Qiddushin both of the Palestinian and the Babylonian Talmud, that Jewish sages had not previously forbidden that two unmarried men sleep together under the same cloak. At the time of the rabbis, the famous love affair between Alcibiades and Socrates in Plato’s Symposium may have been well-known, according to which Alcibiades slips at night under the cloak of Socrates, whom he admired so much, with the intent to seduce him sexually.

Dr. phil. Mag. theol. Karin Hügel
research fellow University of Vienna

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Eine queere Lesart von Kohelet 4,9–12, December 2025, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004746039_004.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page