What is it about?
This essay scrutinizes how the notion of the common good was interpreted within two distinct urban communities of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, in Royal Prussia and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. While the discourse surrounding the common good held significant weight in Polish–Lithuanian political and moral deliberations, urban culture was largely overlooked. This was primarily due to the prevalent belief in the moral inferiority associated with urban and commercial activities. Despite this, the essay presents two case studies demonstrating how the principle of the common good, or “bonum commune,” was actualized in the Commonwealth’s cities.
Featured Image
Photo by Andrea Anastasakis on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This chapter provides a new perspective on the discourse of the common good in an East Central European context, where cities and towns have traditionally been excluded from the analysis of political culture. The examples provided are Danzig (Royal Prussia) during the city’s dispute with King Stephen Báthory and Slutsk (Grand Duchy of Lithuania) during the period of Prince Bogusław Radziwiłł’s ownership. The common good was tightly interwoven with self-interest in urban socio-political and economic life. These two values bolstered each other, creating a potential symbiosis between the common good and individual benefit. Attempts to secure the common good were not perceived as sacrifices but as pursuits of prosperity and overall well-being.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The “Common Good” and Urban Crisis Management in Early Modern East-Central Europe: The Examples of Danzig and Slutsk, October 2023, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/9789004547278_005.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page