What is it about?

The contribution sheds a critical light on the thirty years since the break-up of socialist Yugoslavia. It presents three hypotheses for a critical reorientation of the 1989–91 sequence. Firstly, rather than seeing 1989 as the start of the longue durée of a democratic process, for Yugoslavia this trajectory was ‘realised’ as political chaos and ethnic wars in 1991. Secondly, criticising the chronological view of ‘post-socialism’, it posits post-socialism as having already emerged after 1965, marked by market reforms that ‘withered away’ socialism. Thirdly, and specific to the 1990s, in order to facilitate the transition to capitalism, a ‘primitive accumulation’ of memory and a high degree of violence unfolded, which actually dis-accumulated the socialist infrastructure and socialised means of (re)production. The post-Yugoslav transition proved a genuine ‘contribution’ to ‘making our country great again’: ethnically cleansed nation-states on the horizon of European peripheral capitalism. The contribution concludes on an affirmative note, pointing to the slow resurgence of the Left.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This text makes us understand that transition to capitalism and democracy in the post-Yugoslav context was not exception but a clear historical regression: from transnationalism and interrepublican solidarity to autonomisation of individuals, ethnic definition of state and wars. I am very interested how the nationalist ideology and power of new revisionist collective memory (anti-Yugoslav, anti-socialist) contributed to the transition process, what I call primitive accumulation of memory by the state.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Thirty Years after the Break-up of Yugoslavia, Historical Materialism, April 2022, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/1569206x-20222261.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page