What is it about?
Patient with complete edentulism at least in one arch, maxilla or mandible, were submitted to all on four implanto-prosthetic rehabilitation according to all on four procedure. Following implant placement, patients were divided in 2 groups, one had conventional impression while the other had digital. The different impression techniques were compared
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Digital impression technique for all on four restorations showed to be accurate for prosthesis manufacturing
Perspectives
Writing this article was a satisfactory work because I wanted to innovate the well known topic of all on four restorations giving a digital approach to the procedure
Dr Paolo Capparé
IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute University, Milan
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for “All-on-Four” Restorations, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, March 2016, Quintessence Publishing,
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3900.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
