What is it about?
This article outlines some common reviewer mistakes when it comes to evaluating interpretivist research projects. We describe what interpretivist research typically seeks to accomplish, and why those evaluation mistakes are misaligned with these interpretivist research goals.
Featured Image
Photo by Unseen Studio on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Reviewing within HCI-related fields has become somewhat less friendly towards interpretivist research in recent years, likely due to a few common misunderstandings about the goals and epistemological traditions tied to such work. Reviewers who are not trained to conduct interpretivist projects are often asked to evaluate interpretivist projects, and this article will help them understand how to respect the boundaries of what is appropriate to ask of an interpretivist project.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Evaluating Interpretive Research in HCI, interactions, January 2024, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery),
DOI: 10.1145/3633200.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
