What is it about?
The highest prevalence for the ADHD and non-ADHD children was in the most deprived areas of the community. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in relation to the sex ratio, mean age at referral and diagnosis, mean number of clinics attended, and the time taken to complete the assessment, distribution of the socio-economic deprivation. The main difference between both groups was the high rate of negative teachers’ responses. No teacher’s rating was positive for any child without a diagnosis.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
An ideal care pathway should be conducted within a multidisciplinary team, and rely on availability of evidence-based feedback from the school , which is a more reliable pointer to confirmed diagnosis of ADHD.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: G607(P) Socio-economic characteristics of school-age children screened for ADHD in a local district clinic of England, Archives of Disease in Childhood, April 2016, BMJ,
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310863.592.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page