What is it about?
Antimicrobial Stewards have always wondered if it is possible to optimize empirical antimicrobial therapy without increasing the use of broad-spectrum agents. In this quasi-experimental study, a bundle of institutional management guidelines, antimicrobial stewardship prospective monitoring and rapid diagnostics improved empirical antimicrobial therapy to as high as 97% in critically-ill patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections. This was achieved while using less combination therapy and broad-spectrum agents.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The study provides a proof of concept that optimizing patient care, which is the ultimate goal of antimicrobial stewardship, does not automatically imply excessive use of antibiotics. To the contrary, a systematic approach with heavy stewardship involvement resulted in reduction in the utilization of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. The addition of multiplex PCR panel for rapid identification of bloodstream isolates combined with antimicrobial stewardship team's clinical tools for prediction of antimicrobial resistance allowed timely de-escalation of broad-spectrum agents within 2.2 days.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Cumulative Effect of an Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostic Testing Bundle on Early Streamlining of Antimicrobial Therapy in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2017, ASM Journals,
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00189-17.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page