What is it about?

At present, the metastatic renal cell carcinoma therapeutic landscape in industrialized countries resembles, to a certain extent, the one shown therein: a growing number of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients are receiving several lines of treatments sequentially, and this abundance of options has undoubtedly improved their survival.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

What in recent years has happened in Italy is definitely more difficult to understand; denying highly active treatments to cancer patients just because the Italian Agency for Drugs “fights” pharmaceutical companies over drug prices is really hard to accept. This is just an ultimately useless way to save money, without any serious attempt to prioritize expenses by evaluating how much expense is worthwhile for a given clinical benefit.

Perspectives

However, the subsequent necessary step would (and should) be the real application of such an instrument.

prof pietro previtali
university of pavia

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Editorial Comment from Dr Portaet al. to Patterns of care among patients receiving sequential targeted therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective chart review in the USA, International Journal of Urology, April 2017, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/iju.13351.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page