What is it about?
Ethnographic research is often portrayed as a carefully planned process, but many important insights emerge unexpectedly during fieldwork. This article explores the role of serendipity: the ability to recognize and make sense of surprising observations, encounters or events that were not anticipated when research began. Rather than understanding serendipity as simple luck, the article argues that it combines chance with preparation, experience, curiosity and critical thinking. Drawing on debates within anthropology, it examines how contemporary ethnographers work in a rapidly changing world where fieldwork is increasingly shaped by multiple sites, shifting contexts and institutional constraints. The article shows that good ethnographic research depends not only on following a research plan but also on remaining open to unexpected opportunities that can lead to new questions, methods and forms of understanding.
Featured Image
Photo by Charles Nouwen on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Anthropology has traditionally valued openness to the unexpected, but contemporary research environments increasingly emphasize efficiency, pre-defined objectives, funding requirements and measurable outcomes. This article argues that such pressures may reduce opportunities for the kind of discoveries that have historically contributed to some of the most important advances in ethnographic knowledge. What makes the article distinctive is that it reconsiders serendipity not as mere luck but as a methodological strength. The authors revisit the long anthropological tradition of fieldwork based on observation, reflexivity and curiosity, while also examining how ethnographic practice is changing. They suggest that serendipity should be understood as a combination of unexpected encounters and scholarly insight, requiring ethnographers to be knowledgeable enough to recognize the significance of what initially appears unimportant. The article is particularly timely because anthropologists increasingly conduct research in complex, mobile and rapidly changing contexts. It invites researchers to think carefully about the balance between planning and openness, and argues that anthropology's future depends partly on preserving the space for creativity, experimentation and intellectual surprise.
Perspectives
One of the reasons I find serendipity so fascinating is that it captures something many anthropologists experience but often struggle to explain. Some of the most meaningful insights emerge not when everything goes according to plan, but when plans fail, circumstances change or unexpected events disrupt the research process. Fieldwork teaches us very quickly that reality rarely follows our proposals, timelines or research designs. My own fieldwork experiences have reinforced this conviction. During research in Indonesia, I unexpectedly found myself living through a major earthquake, a volcanic eruption and a tsunami. These events dramatically disrupted my original research plans, but they also provided rare opportunities to understand how people experienced and responded to disaster in their everyday lives. What initially appeared to be a research catastrophe became a powerful lesson about the importance of being attentive to unforeseen developments. The article discusses this example to illustrate how ethnographic knowledge often emerges through circumstances that nobody could have anticipated. What concerns me today is that academic systems increasingly reward speed, productivity and predictable outcomes. Yet anthropology's distinctive contribution often lies precisely in its willingness to slow down, remain attentive and recognize significance where others might see only distraction or coincidence. Serendipity is not simply luck; it requires training, patience, imagination and the confidence to follow unexpected leads. For me, the larger lesson is that anthropology should not lose its capacity for surprise. The world is constantly changing, and ethnographic research remains valuable because it allows us to encounter realities that challenge our assumptions. Serendipity reminds us that some of the most important discoveries are not the answers we set out to find, but the questions we did not know we needed to ask.
Professor Noel B. Salazar
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Contemporary ethnographic practice and the value of serendipity, Social Anthropology, May 2013, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8676.12026.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
