What is it about?
This paper shows formally why pair-wise comparisons to identify conflicting requirements are flawed. Essentially, they are unable to identify conflicts emerging between groups of requirements. This is showcased with a practical example too.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Identifying and removing unnecessary conflicting requirements is key to ensure a design space that contains affordable solutions. This paper shows that existing methods for such early identification are fundamentally flawed, since by being built on pair-wise comparison approaches, they are only able to identify a minimum subset of potential conflicts. This paper sets a scientific foundation to set course in a different direction in terms of developing conflict identification methods.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Concept of Order of Conflict in Requirements Engineering, IEEE Systems Journal, March 2016, Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE),
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2014.2315597.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page