What is it about?
Two haptic guidance methods were compared. One was guidance by vibration motors, the second was by continuously moving "sliding element". Both methods were implemented to a joystick handle. We assessed participant performance and questionary about intuitiveness, effectivity, and efficiency of mentioned methods.
Featured Image
Photo by JESHOOTS.COM on Unsplash
Why is it important?
A significant difference between the two methods has been measured. The performance of the "sliding element" method was better in guidance than methods by vibration motors.
Perspectives
Haptic guidance might improve flight safety. It might help transition from speed control to AoA control of aircraft, which is supposed to be better in loss of control prevention.
Pavel Zikmund
Brno University of Technology
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Comparison of Joystick guidance methods, October 2019, Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE),
DOI: 10.1109/coginfocom47531.2019.9089978.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
