What is it about?

Parallel networks advocating different organizational systems may exist in a particular social space, and that the sustainability of a specific system or a practice may depend upon the efforts and the relative power of the advocators of that system. We show how an accounting innovation - the balanced scorecard - failed to be sustained, amid varying ideologies and interests of powerful actors across time and opponent actors’ perceived deficiencies in its adapted design attributes.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The fate of the balanced scorecard: alternative problematization and competing networks, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, May 2021, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/qram-03-2020-0028.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page