What is it about?
The article looks into how South African companies provide information in their integrated reports, which cover aspects like social, environmental, and ethical practices. The study found that, despite efforts to improve reporting, there's still confusion and uncertainty. Companies are including less information in these reports, and there's a need for clearer guidelines from regulators. The research suggests that companies and regulators may need to rethink how they approach integrated reporting to ensure they provide valuable and useful information to people who rely on it, like investors and stakeholders.
Featured Image
Photo by Lukas Blazek on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This research is important because it investigates the impact of integrated reporting by South African companies on the quality of information they provide. Integrated reports aim to offer a holistic view of a company's social, environmental, and ethical practices, aiding stakeholders in decision-making. The findings highlight a decrease in the amount of information presented in these reports and significant uncertainty about reporting requirements. The importance lies in addressing these challenges to enhance transparency and clarity in integrated reporting. Regulators may need to provide clearer guidelines, and companies may need to reconsider their approach to ensure that stakeholders receive valuable and useful information. Ultimately, the research contributes to the ongoing improvement of reporting practices, benefiting investors, stakeholders, and the broader community by fostering better-informed decision-making in the corporate landscape.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Integrated reporting by South African companies: a case study, October 2017, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/medar-03-2016-0052.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page