What is it about?

Purpose - The practice of cronyism is a pervasive problem for most businesses and a great hindrance for employees, but empirical literature on its outcomes is scant. In light of such gaps, the objective of this study is to examine the relationship between organizational cronyism and employees’ silence behavior through the mediating role of felt violation and the moderating role of continuance commitment. Design/methodology/approach - A time-lagged cross-sectional survey comprising 226 respondents is carried out in a metropolitan city of a developing country. The respondents were selected using convenience sampling technique. Findings - The findings reveal that organizational cronyism influences employees' silence (acquiescent and quiescent) both directly and indirectly (via felt violation). However, continuance commitment was noted to work as a boundary condition only between felt violation and quiescent silence. Research limitations/implications – Although the study deals with common method bias by collecting data in two waves; still, it may restrict causality. The findings not only have implications for the academicians but also contribute to the conservation of resources theory. This study suggests organizations develop and implement a comprehensive intervention strategy that focuses on both prevention and damage control as a result of organizational cronyism. Originality/Value – Drawing upon the conservation of resources theory, this study adds value to the literature by empirically investigating the outcomes of cronyism at work. Moreover, the outcomes and mechanisms under consideration have largely been ignored in the literature.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Employee silence as a response to cronyism in the workplace: the roles of felt violation and continuance commitment, Kybernetes, September 2023, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/k-01-2023-0148.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page