What is it about?

The purpose of this paper is to introduce further clarity to career scholarship and to support the development of career studies by complementing earlier theoretical literature reviews with an evidence-based historical analysis of career-related terms. Design/methodology/approach – Data from 12 career scholars were collected using the historical Delphi method to find consensus on the career terms that have shaped career studies between 1990 and 2012. The authors then explored the literature by collecting data on the occurrence of these terms, analyzing frequencies and trends via citations and indexes of citation using a mixed-method combination of historical literature review and performance analysis. Findings – Career scholarship is indeed a descriptive field, in which metaphors dominate the discipline. Career success and employability are basic terms within the field. The discipline tends to focus narrowly on career agents. There is a plethora of terminology, and, contrary to the expectations, concepts introduced tend not to fade away. Keywords Careers, Career development, Employability, Career studies, Literature analysis, Career success

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The authors offer an overarching perspective of the field with a novel mixed-method analysis which is useful for theory development and will help unify career studies. Earlier comprehensive literature reviews were mostly based on theoretical reasoning or qualitative data. The authors complement them with results based on quantitative data. Lastly, the authors identify new research directions for the career scholarship community.

Perspectives

We fet that it is important to offer a comprehensive perspective about the field and what concepts and ideas are utilized by the career scholarly community.

Professor Yehuda Baruch
University of Southampton

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Career studies in search of theory: the rise and rise of concepts, Career Development International, February 2015, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/cdi-11-2013-0137.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page