What is it about?
This paper analyzes the evolution of the Bitcoin economy by mapping how transactions flow between different types of users and businesses over time. Using data from 2009 to 2015, it categorizes Bitcoin addresses into clusters representing entities such as exchanges, mining pools, gambling platforms, and black markets. By studying these clusters, the research identifies three distinct phases in Bitcoin’s history: 1. Early Prototype Stage: Bitcoin was dominated by mining and experimentation. 2. "Sin" Stage: The network grew rapidly but was heavily used for online gambling and black markets. 3. Mature Stage: Legitimate businesses like exchanges became central, driving broader adoption. The study uses network analysis to map relationships between clusters and identify how Bitcoin’s economy transitioned from a niche experiment to a structured ecosystem. It also examines how entities in the network interact, revealing patterns such as daily transaction flows and specific behaviors linked to different business types.
Featured Image
Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This paper is unique because it provides a comprehensive, data-driven picture of Bitcoin’s economic development over its first six years. Instead of focusing solely on Bitcoin’s technical or financial aspects, it highlights the social and organizational dynamics behind its adoption and growth. By categorizing and analyzing transaction patterns, the study sheds light on how Bitcoin’s use evolved over time and became more mainstream. It’s timely because blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies continue to reshape global finance. Understanding Bitcoin’s historical development helps us anticipate how other emerging technologies might grow and adapt to social and economic forces.
Perspectives
It’s not just about Bitcoin as a currency—it’s about understanding the communities and businesses that drive its evolution. I was particularly struck by the transition from the "sin" phase to the "mature" phase. It highlights how Bitcoin’s early associations with illicit activities didn’t define its long-term trajectory. Instead, legitimate businesses like exchanges played a key role in stabilizing and growing the network. This evolution reflects a broader pattern in how disruptive technologies move from the margins to the mainstream. For me, this research underscores the importance of seeing technology not just as a tool but as part of a larger social and economic system. By studying Bitcoin’s payment relationships, the paper offers valuable insights into how new technologies build legitimacy and scale in complex, interconnected worlds.
Dr. Adam Hayes
University of Lucerne
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The evolution of the bitcoin economy, The Journal of Risk Finance, March 2018, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/jrf-03-2017-0059.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
