What is it about?

Real estate investment appraisals often rely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) to judge whether a deal is attractive. To calculate an IRR, investors forecast cash flows and then assume an exit yield to convert the final year’s rent into a sale price. In practice, that exit yield is usually chosen independently of the entry price and the investor’s required return. This creates a problem. If the exit yield is inconsistent with the pricing and risk assumptions used at purchase, the resulting IRR no longer represents a meaningful, risk-adjusted return. This paper shows that exit yields should not be treated as fixed inputs. They should change as the income security of an asset changes over time, for example as a lease shortens or becomes more uncertain, even if overall market pricing is unchanged. The paper introduces a yield curve framework that links yields directly to income security. Using simulation, it shows how differences in lease length affect return volatility and, therefore, the return investors require. Yields are then derived from those required returns rather than assumed arbitrarily. The result is a practical way to ensure that entry pricing, cash-flow assumptions and exit pricing are aligned. When this approach is used, IRRs reflect genuine differences in risk and income security rather than inconsistencies in modelling. The framework can be implemented within standard real estate appraisal models without changing existing systems.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Real estate worth: deriving consistent exit yields, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, June 2026, Emerald,
DOI: 10.1108/jpif-02-2026-0030.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page