What is it about?

Humans excel at assessing conspecific emotional valence and intensity, based solely on non-verbal vocal bursts that are also common in other mammals. It is not known, however, whether human listeners rely on similar acoustic cues to assess emotional content in conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations, and which acoustical parameters affect their performance. Here, for the first time, we directly compared the emotional valence and intensity perception of dog and human non-verbal vocalizations. We revealed similar relationships between acoustic features and emotional valence and intensity ratings of human and dog vocalizations: those with shorter call lengths were rated as more positive, whereas those with a higher pitch were rated as more intense.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Our findings demonstrate that humans rate conspecific emotional vocalizations along basic acoustic rules, and that they apply similar rules when processing dog vocal expressions. This suggests that humans may utilize similar mental mechanisms for recognizing human and heterospecific vocal emotions.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, January 2014, Royal Society Publishing,
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0926.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page