What is it about?
Background The next generation of PhD-prepared nurses must be forward-thinking and equipped to solve existing and emerging health care problems requiring educators to reimagine curricula to surpass conventional scientific methods. Problem Limited guidance exists on effectively integrating human-centered design (HCD) with scientific methods in doctoral education. Approach Grounded in a learner-centered paradigm, faculty developed a doctoral-level innovation and intervention course that blended HCD with traditional research methodologies. This article explores the course’s philosophical approach, design and implementation, highlighting challenges as well as areas of convergence and divergence between the 2 approaches. Emphasis is placed on how these dynamics shaped teaching strategies and student learning. Outcome A pedagogical model emerged structured around the 3 integrated domains of the course: design thinking, philosophical and theoretical frameworks, and complementary research methods. Conclusions The model supports the development of adaptive nurse scientists equipped to engage with complex health care problems through iterative, stakeholder-informed inquiry.
Featured Image
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This article addresses the need for doctoral programs to equip future scientists with the skills they need to tackle complex health and health care issues.
Perspectives
Writing this article provided insight into the importance of publishing the creative and innovative things we do to prepare nurse scientists.
Dr Dana Hansen
Kent State University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Bridging Human-Centered Design and Science, Nurse Educator, January 2026, Wolters Kluwer Health,
DOI: 10.1097/nne.0000000000002070.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







