Publication not explained

This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.

If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology, Research Evaluation, May 2015, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv009.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page