What is it about?
How does the tort system of compensation for personal injury compare to the provision made for workers under the state’s industrial injury scheme? The relative significance of the two schemes has rarely been considered and has not been dealt with in any law journal. Although lawyers are ever-present in tort claims, they have little involvement with applications for social security benefit. Partly as a result, there is a stark contrast between the voluminous literature on the common law, on the one hand, and the very limited information about statute-based workers’ compensation on the other. This article tries to redress the balance by bringing the industrial scheme back into the spotlight.
Featured Image
Photo by Tom Jur on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Comparisons are made of entitlement under both systems and the value of the compensation they provide. The industrial scheme is shown to pay benefits which, in the long term, can often exceed the lump sum paid in tort. A wide range of statistics is used to illustrate the relative importance and practical effect of the two regimes. In tracing the history of workers’ compensation the enduring significance of the industrial scheme is revealed together with other findings which may surprise those familiar only with litigation at common law.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Industrial Injuries Compensation, Industrial Law Journal, June 2017, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwx007.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page