What is it about?
Many political scientists argue that when considering foreign policy decisions, leaders prioritize firstly their domestic political position, and won't shoot themselves in the foot with a decision that is too costly in domestic political terms. Using the case study of Tony Blair and the Second Lebanon War I show conditions under which a leader may follow their own convictions, even in the face of heavy domestic political costs.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
My paper shows that we should not assume politicians will always be driven primarily my the desire to hold on to power, and prompts us to think about the kinds of leaders we really want: those who have the 'courage of their convictions', or those who are responsive to the public mood?
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: When Conviction Trumps Domestic Politics: Tony Blair and the Second Lebanon War, Foreign Policy Analysis, October 2017, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/fpa/orx004.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page