Featured Image
Why is it important?
This chapter explores the globalization school's predictions for the pursuit of security. First, it examines the various strands of the demise of the state argument, including those of hard globalization proponents, soft globalization proponents, and commercial liberals, as well as two other groups with claims that are compatible with our definition of globalization, democratic peace theory, and constructivist arguments about the spread of globalized political norms. It then culls out of these positions a set of common propositions about the effect globalization is likely to have on the way states pursue security. It identifies macro-level propositions about the level of interstate war, aggregate defense spending, the prominence of transnational terrorism, and the role of multilateral institutions at the international system level. It then identifies state- and region-specific propositions about the national security strategies and architectures of individual states.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Globalization and National Security: Key Propositions, February 2010, Oxford University Press (OUP),
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393903.003.0002.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page