What is it about?
The article explores some of the limitations in Hybrid Governance, specifically within the Afghan sociopolitical context.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Too often analysts advance uncritical acceptance of the advantages of Hybridism as a possible solution to Afghanistan's (or for that matter, any post-conlfict country) myriad governance problems. This analysis challenges uncritical acceptance and identifies some of the problems that Hybridism encourages/generates.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Limits of ‘Hybrid Governance’ in Afghanistan, Strategic Analysis, July 2014, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2014.918412.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page