What is it about?
This article challenges two widely held views regarding Sāṁkhya: a) there are two kinds of opposing bhāva – sāttvika and tāmasika and b) Sāṁkhya Kārikā and Bhagavad-Gita present independent versions of Sāṁkhya. Both of the views are partly there because of certain misunderstandings regarding the bhāva doctrine of classical Sāṁkhya. I make an attempt to address the issue by restoring the meaning of the 23rd verse of the Sāṁkhya Kārikā.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The significance of the articles lies in the fact that it rectifies a near about two millennia old misinterpretation of a Sāṁkhya doctrine. This rectification helps to make better sense of the oldest Indian philosophy.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: TheRāga Bhāvain theSāṁkhya Kārikā: Rectifying an Age-Old Mistake, Asian Philosophy, April 2014, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2014.917831.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
