What is it about?
In this article, we draw on a survey conducted with elite upcoming lawyers from all around the world to shed new light on the ethical acceptability of file sharing practices. Although file sharing is typically illegal, our findings show that lawyers overwhelmingly perceive it as an acceptable social practice. The main criterion used by lawyers to decide on the ethical acceptability of file sharing is whether or not the infringer derives any monetary benefits from it. Further, our findings show that lawyers in the public sector (including judiciary and academia) are even more tolerant of online copyright infringement than those in the private sector. Interestingly, our data suggests that this is largely the result of self-selection: lawyers who lean more on the side of broad disclosure and social sharing tend to orient themselves toward the public sector. Implications for the current state of the debate on the reform of copyright law are discussed.
Featured Image
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Should digital files be considered a commons? Copyright infringement in the eyes of lawyers, The Information Society, May 2019, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2019.1616019.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page